Jump to content

Flybe nosedives on profits warning


Andy Onchan

Recommended Posts

A full 737/A320 flying to a destination 1-2 hours away makes money. Other sized aircraft and routes are much more financially precarious and a usually relies on busines travel to make a profit.

 

At the present fare levels I therefore have no idea how all our routes don't loose a fortune.

I reckon they are marginal and weighed against other costs and benefits. For example: An Easyjet aircraft and crew can fit in an IOM return between other routes when it couldn't easily do anything else other than sit on the ground costing money. If the schedule for the aircraft is running late, IOM is easily dropped out. That kind of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A full 737/A320 flying to a destination 1-2 hours away makes money. Other sized aircraft and routes are much more financially precarious and a usually relies on busines travel to make a profit.

 

At the present fare levels I therefore have no idea how all our routes don't loose a fortune.

 

If this is so, then Flybe must be in a precarious situation across the board, as all their aircraft are smaller than than that. But I would have thought that 1 to 2 hour sectors on 'non sunshine' routes are exactly what machines like the Dash 8 - 400s and the Stobart's ATRs are designed to do? If they fill 'em up reasonably well, then they must be doing something else wrong to be losing money. In fact, they put a lot of the blame on IT related cost according to the statement.

 

I wouldn't be surprised to see a network contraction, though, dropping routes where demand is too low. It's been a while since I was on Flybe (!), so I'm not sure how things are on the IoM routes.

Edited by guzzi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as an aside (and I'm hardly suggesting this 19 seat aircraft is what we need) I wondered what a 5 year old Twin Otter, as mentioned in the Edinburgh thread, would cost to buy. A decent one with EFIS can be about £5 million (about x5 what I had imagined).

 

What would that cost a day in lease then add crewing, fuel, insurance, maintenance, airways fees, landing fees etc etc. How can they then charge £40 for a 40 minutes flight and make money?

 

I travel regularly midweek to and from MAN. There is rarely more than about 25 pax but I suppose a full ATR72 might make a few bob.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A twotter probably costs just over a grand a sector EDI-IOM after pax charges. Based on citywings Glasgow load factors of just over 55% from the airport figures that's 10-11 pax a flight. So 100 bucks average a passenger to make it pay.

 

Simply makes it clear that eastern or loganair aren't going to be on the route come this time next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A twotter probably costs just over a grand a sector EDI-IOM after pax charges. Based on citywings Glasgow load factors of just over 55% from the airport figures that's 10-11 pax a flight. So 100 bucks average a passenger to make it pay.

 

Simply makes it clear that eastern or loganair aren't going to be on the route come this time next year.

That's what I said earlier in the thread. To sustain a service operators will require some support.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
On ‎31‎/‎03‎/‎2017 at 11:17 PM, quilp said:

Is there a parachute strategy..?

they will be needing one pretty soon,but I've been pessimistic on this heap of shit for a few years now,how much longer can they last?.wold YOU feel secure booking a flight with them,i wouldn't.

http://www.cityam.com/274092/flybe-warns-profits-due-disappointing-rise-maintenance

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The maintenance cost issue seems about as plausible as the IT problems that they came up with last March for poor performance.

I suspect there's a fundamental business model issue at stake here. IT and maintenance costs would appear to be periphery issues to the main operating problem.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Andy Onchan said:

What I don't understand is why they should be having maintenance cost issues, as a fair proportion of their operation is outsourced to Stobart and Loganair(?). 

I think you will find that currently they only have the 2 stobart aircraft on the iom operating on their behalf and no Loganair aircraft. So not really a fair proportion.

Most of Flybe maintenance is contracted to Monarch engineering division

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...