Jump to content

Residents object to Derbyhaven development.


Max Power

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, GD4ELI said:

Point of Ayre. And it's only some dog owners.

You'd be surprised at the number of restrictions and no-go areas up there now...to owners as well as dogs. Big areas of the shingle foreshore roped and taped off and activity restrictions further west towards Ballaghennie. Very much a wildlife-centric area now, recreation as it used to be a definite 2nd best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Cambon said:

Perfect place to put half a dozen wind turbines (or more). Not residential. Wind from all directions. Site ready and available. Perfect! 

It's actually not a good place for wind. I know you were just jesting but .... The prevailing wind is from the SW so having wind turbine at sea level in the NE is the antipathies of optimum. 

South Barrule is the best place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Non-Believer said:

You'd be surprised at the number of restrictions and no-go areas up there now...to owners as well as dogs. Big areas of the shingle foreshore roped and taped off and activity restrictions further west towards Ballaghennie. Very much a wildlife-centric area now, recreation as it used to be a definite 2nd best.

Those taped off areas will be gone soon when the shoreline nesting birds leave !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GD4ELI said:

Point of Ayre. And it's only some dog owners.

but think of all those 200 foot high  pylons bringing the electricity to Douglas , I hope all these logistical issues have been  carefully studied , plus he huge amount of concrete for the bases , 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/15/2023 at 4:08 PM, WTF said:

who knew you were a golfer, probably lost your balls there too. 

If balls are absent here, it's Malew Commissioners who have been consistently lacking in same.

Just how long does this nonsense have to go on for before they serve a notice under s24 of the Building Control Act 1991?

Would any Malew Commissioner care to respond here to explain your (apparent) lack of action? 

https://www.legislation.gov.im/cms/images/LEGISLATION/PRINCIPAL/1991/1991-0021/BuildingControlAct1991_1.pdf

Edited by Yibble
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Happier diner said:

It's actually not a good place for wind. I know you were just jesting but .... The prevailing wind is from the SW so having wind turbine at sea level in the NE is the antipathies of optimum. 

South Barrule is the best place. 

NE? It is SE, with clear run to SW. yes, it was in jest. However, putting them along the edge of the Airport is not. Already owned, cleared and secure area. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Cambon said:

NE? It is SE, with clear run to SW. yes, it was in jest. However, putting them along the edge of the Airport is not. Already owned, cleared and secure area. 

Yeah the wind would be fine there.  The planes, not so much! 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Cambon said:

NE? It is SE, with clear run to SW. yes, it was in jest. However, putting them along the edge of the Airport is not. Already owned, cleared and secure area. 

 

13 minutes ago, The Phantom said:

Yeah the wind would be fine there.  The planes, not so much! 

If they get the wind turbines in the right place it would reduce the wind for the planes too. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Phantom said:

Yeah the wind would be fine there.  The planes, not so much! 

There used to be a wind turbine at the airport many years ago. The obviously thought it was ok back then. The planes themselves would not be affected. The turbines would be nowhere near the runways. 
 

Plus, on foggy days we can reverse the polarity and blow it away reducing flight delays and cancellations. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, asitis said:

So as usual it appears the developer have everyone over a barrel !

 

Why? Fort Island Developments / Dandara don't have a God-given right to make a profit. If they've made a bad commercial decision, on the (incorrect) assumption they were going to get to build a housing estate there, tough titty.

Edited by Yibble
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...