Jump to content

IOM Covid removing restrictions


Filippo

Recommended Posts

On 9/15/2023 at 7:22 PM, John Wright said:

Of course the antivaxers have learned nothing. Neither have mask sceptics. It’s a sensible precaution as is the autumn booster campaign for older and at risk groups.

 

On 9/16/2023 at 1:30 AM, Utah 01 said:

I really don't effing believe it!  Have they learnt nothing? The hysteria merchants are ramping it based on the same myths and legends as the great COVID catastrophe we've just endured.

 

On 9/16/2023 at 10:03 AM, WTF said:

Lockdown didn't combat spread, it just delayed it, the spread still happened.

 

On 9/19/2023 at 6:40 AM, NoTail said:

Given the opportunity I would get a booster. The vaccine is known to be effective.

 

On 9/19/2023 at 7:53 AM, ricardo said:

This forums’ self appointed experts on everything are blessed with the gift of, er, knowing everything, it seems. Hopefully though, a few readers will research the knowledgeable Dr McCullough, and perhaps heed some of his advice. For the rest, yes of course, the ‘vaccines’ are “safe and effective”. Like all vaccines in history before them - if one gets one’s info from the mainstream that is...

 

On 9/19/2023 at 9:14 AM, kevster said:

They (the mainstream) have done a bloody good job then in covering up the continuing spread of smallpox and polio that vaccines have apparently prevented

 

On 9/19/2023 at 9:25 AM, newaccount said:

After all this time you still haven't googled the efficacy of a vaccine...

 

On 9/19/2023 at 11:27 PM, hampsterkahn said:

Covid Vaccination is not compulsory.

If you choose  not to have it, for whatever your  reasons , then don’t have it.

You don’t need to tell us those reasons.

No really, thanks.

 

On 9/20/2023 at 12:31 PM, P.K. said:

Had my covid booster this AM.

All the anti-vaxxers seem unbothered by the scenario that if someone is gullibleenough to believe their nonsense and therefore don't get vaccinated and then contract covid and succumb to it then the ultimate responsibility for their untimely demise will rest with the anti-vaxxers....

 

On 9/20/2023 at 12:46 PM, Jarndyce said:

I find myself aligning with @hampsterkahn’s view on this - to quote:

“Covid Vaccination is not compulsory.

If you choose not to have it, for whatever your reasons, then don’t have it.

You don’t need to tell us those reasons”

 

On 9/21/2023 at 1:14 PM, CrazyDave said:

I agree, but I also remember there was a time when I didn’t really want the vaccine as I didn’t feel I needed it yet had it as I felt like I would need it to go about my normal life. It wasn’t compulsory but I would suggest a lot only had it to be able to travel easily and attend events.

 

On 9/26/2023 at 7:39 PM, AcousticallyChallenged said:

Are you qualified to tell the difference between a good and bad scientific paper?

Anyone can pay to submit to a crap journal. 

The irony is that some of the various anti-vax and anti-5G claims have not insignificant links to Russia.

The GRU specialise in spreading fake news. 

And as for Dr McCullough, you’ll notice he’s being sued by a former employer for falsely claiming ongoing affiliation. If he isn’t honest about his employer, what else isn’t he honest about? 

 

19 hours ago, Cambon said:

Nothing did. It did ravage the planet.  

 

Much to the shock of you covidians fools, the scientific bibliography espousing the many harms caused by the covid injectables is vast. Repeated “covid vaccinations” increase the risk from covid rather than diminishing it; and cause diffuse inflammation of the hearth and other organs as well as serious immune dysregulation and imbalance.

Just to make an example, you may wish to check these two papers (but really one has the embarrassment of choice):

1. IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein

Published on “Vaccines” (an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal published monthly online by MDPI, which is affiliated to The American Society for Virology) and available on this link:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222767/pdf/vaccines-11-00991.pdf

2. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations - The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs

Published on “Food and Chemical Toxicology” (an internationally renowned journal that publishes original research articles and reviews on toxic effects of natural or synthetic chemicals occurring in the human environment with particular emphasis on food, drugs etc) and available on this link:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

For your convenience, in the following there are some excerpts from the above two mentioned publications (trigger alert: it is going to be very disconcerting for you commoners and dimwits).

********** Abstract” ─ Paper 1 ─ Pag 1 **********

[...] emerging evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals.

********** Paper 1 ─ Pag 14-15 **********

(1) By ignoring the spike protein synthesized as a consequence of vaccination, the host immune system may become vulnerable to re-infection with the new Omicron subvariants, allowing for free replication of the virus once a reinfection takes place. In this situation, we suggest that even these less pathogenic Omicron subvariants could cause significant harm and even death in individuals with comorbidities and immuno-compromised conditions.

(2) mRNA and inactivated vaccines temporally impair interferon signaling [142,143], possibly causing immune suppression and leaving the individual in a vulnerable situation against any other pathogen. In addition, this immune suppression could allow the re-activation of latent viral, bacterial, or fungal infections and might also allow the uncontrolled growth of cancer cells [144].

(3) A tolerant immune system might allow SARS-CoV-2 persistence in the host and promote the establishment of a chronic infection, similar to that generated by the hepatitis B virus (HBV), the human immune deficiency virus (HIV), and the hepatitis C virus (HCV) [145]

(4) The combined immune suppression (produced by SARS-CoV-2 infection [15–22] and further enhanced by vaccination [142–144]) could explain a plethora of autoimmune conditions, such as cancers, reinfections, and deaths temporally associated with both. It is conceivable that the excess deaths reported in several highly COVID-19-vaccinated countries may be explained, in part, by this combined immunosuppressive effect.

(5) Repeated vaccination could also lead to auto-immunity: [...] Thus, it is probable that the spike protein produced in response to mRNA vaccination is too high and lasts too long in the body. That could overwhelm the capacity of the immune system, leading to autoimmunity [146,147]. Indeed, several investigations have found that COVID-19 immunization is associated with the development of autoimmune responses [148–166].

(6) Increased IgG4 levels induced by repeated vaccination could lead to autoimmune myocarditis; it has been suggested that IgG4 antibodies can also cause an autoimmune reaction by impeding the immune system’s ability to be suppressed by regulatory T cells [102]. Patients using immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination have been linked to occurrences of acute myocarditis [103–107], sometimes with lethal consequences [102]. As anti-PD-1 antibodies are class IgG4, and these antibodies are also induced by repeated vaccination, it is plausible to suggest that excessive vaccination could be associated with the occurrence of an increased number of myocarditis cases and sudden cardiac deaths.

********** Abstract” ─ Paper 2 ─ Pag 1 **********

The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease has no precedent. The many alterations in the vaccine mRNA hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein. However, the immune response to the vaccine is very different from that to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. We show evidence from the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines questions them as positive contributors to public health.

********** Paper 2 ─ Pag 16 **********

However, as we have outlined in our paper, if the mRNA vaccinations are leading to widespread dysregulation of oncogene controls, cell cycle regulation, and apoptosis, then VAERS reports should reflect an increase in reports of cancer, relative to the other vaccines, even if the numbers are small. The experiment demonstrating impairment of DNA repair mechanisms by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in an in vitro study provides compelling evidence that the vaccines could accelerate the rate of DNA mutations, increasing cancer risk (Jiang and Mei, 2021).

In this paper, we call attention to three very important aspects of the safety profile of these vaccinations. First is the extensively documented subversion of innate immunity, primarily via suppression of IFN-α and its associated signaling cascade. This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections. Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations. Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike glycoprotein mRNA to produce high levels of spike-glycoprotein-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inflammatory consequences. Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do all these anti vaxxers loons start posting everywhere as soon as another booster is launched?

Heading & his band are still out every day in Ramsey, no doubt all drawing benefits from the state they don’t recognize & that other anti vaxxer Laurence Fox is in trouble again for sexism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Entropy said:

This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections. Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations. Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike glycoprotein mRNA to produce high levels of spike-glycoprotein-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inflammatory consequences. Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.

Are you using your grandad's typewriter?

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Banker said:

Why do all these anti vaxxers loons start posting everywhere as soon as another booster is launched?

Heading & his band are still out every day in Ramsey, no doubt all drawing benefits from the state they don’t recognize & that other anti vaxxer Laurence Fox is in trouble again for sexism 

Justice is hard to find.

But, I'm not sure you'll find it at some traffic lights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...