Banker Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GD4ELI Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 19 minutes ago, Banker said: Any chance you could summarise the article for those of us without a digital subscription? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wavey Davey Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 21 minutes ago, Banker said: The millionaire Boot proving himself to be the greedy bastard we already knew he was. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 Just now, Roxanne said: Age discrimination? Don’t make me laugh. There was a reason both of them weren’t voted back in and it had nothing to do with their ages. Yeah, like, maybe that video of Boot telling some pikies to go back to their land. Amongst other things: they were useless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandits Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 1 minute ago, Roxanne said: There was a reason both of them weren’t voted back in and it had nothing to do with their ages. Yes both useless twats who got 5 years of taxpayers money. Boot is a self entitled freeloader. He owns a couple of hundred houses in the UK. But still thinks he can stitch the Manx taxpayer up for a few extra quid. He’s nothing more than a greedy self entitled wind-bag. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Sausages Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 6 minutes ago, NoTailT said: Yeah, like, maybe that video of Boot telling some pikies to go back to their land. Amongst other things: they were useless. Not as bad as you though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banker Posted May 31, 2022 Author Share Posted May 31, 2022 25 minutes ago, GD4ELI said: Any chance you could summarise the article for those of us without a digital subscription? Sorry don’t have one, but something about them not being pensionable age so they are not getting pay out from government so claiming age discrimination, bitter ex politicians!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 Boot's 69 and Perkins 66/7 so they are of pensionable age. I imagine the claim will be that they didn't get the parachute payment other ejected MHKs get, but went straight onto the MHK pension scheme. I wonder how they voted on Tynwald members pensions and benefits when in the house. 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0bserver Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 Could we sue Boot and Perkins for claiming to be 'politicians' when they were actually a pair of shithouses? 5 1 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Declan Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 9 minutes ago, 0bserver said: Could we sue Boot and Perkins for claiming to be 'politicians' when they were actually a pair of shithouses? That's hardly misrepresentation. 1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoTailT Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 56 minutes ago, Mr. Sausages said: Not as bad as you though. 😞 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0bserver Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 1 hour ago, Banker said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManxTaxPayer Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 48 minutes ago, 0bserver said: Could we sue Boot and Perkins for claiming to be 'politicians' when they were actually a pair of shithouses? What, sue Perkins? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omobono Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 51 minutes ago, Declan said: Boot's 69 and Perkins 66/7 so they are of pensionable age. I imagine the claim will be that they didn't get the parachute payment other ejected MHKs get, but went straight onto the MHK pension scheme. I wonder how they voted on Tynwald members pensions and benefits when in the house. the section of the scheme was introduced to provide a younger keys member with a family and below retirement age a mechanism to receive 6 months salary if they were to loose their seat at the general election , it was to provide a financial parachute , in effect to enable them to find another job or source of income , I don't think those over retirement age or in receipt of a state pension are entitled to claim under the terms of the scheme prior to this scheme a keys member had to serve 2 full terms (10 years ) before qualifying for a pension , 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amadeus Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.