2bees Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 She and hammer man should get 5 years & a get off heroin free card. If I ran the world, half the people in prison would be set free so the proper criminals could be helped and there would be no NHS smak in prison, paracetamol would be the height of it. How hard is it? Pffft! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 I don't see the fuss. A girl stole money and she was caught. Obviously processes were sufficient to catch her. This could and does happen in all sectors (churches, charities, business ....). You should make a fuss when money is stolen and no one is caught/found accountable. 49 year old woman-when do they stop being called 'girl' When they are 56? Yep. And the following year they call them "elderly woman". Which do you prefer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Border Terrier Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 They are short staffed in government after the MARS scheme, don't you know. They didn't expect so many people to go, Eddie Teare said so. Eddie only has himself to blame as staff can't leave without Mutual consent. But let's face it, if a raft of crap managers want to leave at the cost of a years (dependent on service) salary, then why not? If they won't do the job they're contracted to do to an acceptable standard, I'd bin them via Capability quick smart. TBT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M 2.0 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Just what is this retiring at 55 deal? I could understand it if they were manual workers doing a job in all weathers that took its toll on their bodies over the course of their working lives but sat at a desk in an office, what's that all about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert Tatlock Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 Just what is this retiring at 55 deal? I could understand it if they were manual workers doing a job in all weathers that took its toll on their bodies over the course of their working lives but sat at a desk in an office, what's that all about?...it's about £1.5 Billion in liabilities at the moment...that we and our children's children have been committed to, by the biggest bunch of selve-serving leeches this island has ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M 2.0 Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 WOW, that's some extreme cost... but WHY do they get to retire so early, especially as the rest of the working population are now expected to work for longer. There must be a reason, does anyone know what it is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 22, 2015 Share Posted August 22, 2015 WOW, that's some extreme cost... but WHY do they get to retire so early, especially as the rest of the working population are now expected to work for longer. There must be a reason, does anyone know what it is? It's an option. The earliest you can retire at a reduced pension. Most don't because they can't afford to even if they want to. Majority work to around 60. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wann Posted August 23, 2015 Author Share Posted August 23, 2015 Can't afford to my arse. Mortgage paid off, kids off their hands. And most at 60 - wow! can't be bad for a lifetime of 'tea drinking and pen pushing'. So leave school at 16 with a handful of attendance qualifications, join CS as a clerk being promoted out of the way for a few decades, and even at age 46 with the big 30 years in the pension pot, the pension is already 10+ times what they deserve. With all these upper echelon Government paid retirees, the Island is full of the equivalent of lottery winners who have chosen their 'win' to be paid every month for the rest of their lives. And that is on top of that lump sum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finlo Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 WOW, that's some extreme cost... but WHY do they get to retire so early, especially as the rest of the working population are now expected to work for longer. There must be a reason, does anyone know what it is? The very reason they want us to work longer is to pay for them to retire early! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hillshepherd Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 WOW, that's some extreme cost... but WHY do they get to retire so early, especially as the rest of the working population are now expected to work for longer. There must be a reason, does anyone know what it is? It's an option. The earliest you can retire at a reduced pension. Most don't because they can't afford to even if they want to. Majority work to around 60. BIG DEAL (yes i am shouting) try the building trade,retire at 65 and NO guaranteed pension,these bastards have it far too easy at OUR expense and i include police and firemen in this,they can [i'm sure] carry out much more efficiently jobs after peak performance period in their careers doing duties they are now recruiting AND TRAINING civvies to do,instead of stealing jobs from others and collecting their big fat pensions to boot,disgusted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forestboy Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 WOW, that's some extreme cost... but WHY do they get to retire so early, especially as the rest of the working population are now expected to work for longer. There must be a reason, does anyone know what it is? It's an option. The earliest you can retire at a reduced pension. Most don't because they can't afford to even if they want to. Majority work to around 60. BIG DEAL (yes i am shouting) try the building trade,retire at 65 and NO guaranteed pension,these bastards have it far too easy at OUR expense and i include police and firemen in this,they can [i'm sure] carry out much more efficiently jobs after peak performance period in their careers doing duties they are now recruiting AND TRAINING civvies to do,instead of stealing jobs from others and collecting their big fat pensions to boot,disgusted. Basically agree with you HS but police and fire service conditions have changed considerably in recent times - unlike civil servants. A major change is lengthening service years before pension entitlement and huge increases in pension contributions again unlike civil servants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliff Hazard Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 I can't picture this woman but I'm sure I must know her. As if the £98k wasn't bad enough she had to stick her fingers in the Christmas jar as well - nice! In for 98 grand, in for a pound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hillshepherd Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 I can't picture this woman but I'm sure I must know her. As if the £98k wasn't bad enough she had to stick her fingers in the Christmas jar as well - nice! In for 98 grand, in for a pound. THIEVING BITCH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FACT Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 And where is her bail address, she hasn't been seen in Ramsey, where she lives alone in a 4 bedroomed commissioner's house, for ages. She's never there normally anyway, except when her fella is staying over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolley Posted August 23, 2015 Share Posted August 23, 2015 WOW, that's some extreme cost... but WHY do they get to retire so early, especially as the rest of the working population are now expected to work for longer. There must be a reason, does anyone know what it is? It's an option. The earliest you can retire at a reduced pension. Most don't because they can't afford to even if they want to. Majority work to around 60. BIG DEAL (yes i am shouting) try the building trade,retire at 65 and NO guaranteed pension,these bastards have it far too easy at OUR expense and i include police and firemen in this,they can [i'm sure] carry out much more efficiently jobs after peak performance period in their careers doing duties they are now recruiting AND TRAINING civvies to do,instead of stealing jobs from others and collecting their big fat pensions to boot,disgusted. I wasn't condoning it. Just stating the facts inasmuch as if you retire at 55 you get a much lower pension than if you retire at 60 as in any other defined benefit occupational pension scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.